Round on Flags – looks stupid on Slideshare without the Powerpoint animations

Have a good day. Cheers!

1. The essence of Infinite Rebound is the outlandish funda that resides behind each question. A certain “wow” element behind every question in an IR makes for a good round. IR is designed for long, workout-able questions where all teams have enough time to come up with a really “inspired” guess which often turns out to be the answer. With sixty questions being made on IR, the flavour of IR often gets compromised. Many questions are made just to comply with the “IR quota” which need not exist. Reduction of questions in IR to 30 would help a lot. Moreover, IR questions can be made one per day over the period of an entire month.
2. Moving over to the connects – points for individual questions in a connect need to be scrapped. This, I say, keeping a lot of factors in mind. If there are no points for individual questions, people can focus on getting the overall connect right. As there will be no exchange of sheets for evaluation, a lot of time will be saved. Also, if individual points are given for the connect, the “connect round” assumes a lot of importance over the other rounds. Say, there is a 10q connect with 10 points per question and an overall 100 points for the connect. The worth of the connect round becomes 200 points. With two such rounds, connects are worth 400 points and overshadow all other rounds. Infinite Rebound which is supposed to be the crux of the quiz gets reduced to a mere farce. Scrapping individual points for connect questions could do the trick. If not completely scrapped, the points awarded for each question should be very minimal. The Long Visual Connects (LVCs) are fine as points are awarded to each block of visuals and no points for individual questions.
3. All the “dry” questions which are often used as IR could be incorporated as a written round. If thirty questions are to be included as a written round, then perhaps they could be split up in 3 sets of 10 each instead of 30 at a go.
4. Print ads, identification of visuals, audio clips could be incorporated in another written A/V round instead of including them in the IR.
5. Also, I’d like to touch on the “answer slide”. Most often, the answer slide consists of just the one or two word answer. In the case of workoutable questions, an effort should be made to explain how the answer could have been derived from the question. Any supplementary text which would help the viewer to understand what the question was all about would be appreciated. Also, to create visual recall, the answer slide would do well to have a picture of the answer. For a question like, “Who became Murali’s 800th Test victim ?” – one can have a pic of Pragyan Ojha along with the answer. The effect is not so pronounced or evident in the above question. But with other high funda questions, pictures could make a clinching difference as the audience would be able to identify themselves with the questions rather than thinking of them as an exercise in rapid reading.

A typical quiz Thursday SPQC quiz could be framed in the following format -

• 8 Question Current Affairs Written  (8*5=40 pts)
• 15 IR Clockwise (15*10=150 pts)
• Connect/LVC (5 point depreciation per slide starting from 50)
• 8 Dry Questions Written (8*5=40 pts)
• 8 Q Dedicated Audio/Visual (8*5=40 pts)
• 15 IR Anticlock (15*10=150 pts)
• Connect/LVC (5 point depreciation per slide starting from 50)

Of course, this need not be the exact format of the quiz all the time. The idea is not to straight-jacket the QMs into conforming to a certain format. QMs can change the order, number of questions, perhaps introduce a new round. But if the above format is taken as a base to build upon, it would ensure equitable distribution of points. And the quiz will not be skewed towards a particular round or a particular team. I’m a little apprehensive that such a fixed format might just prove to be an impediment for first time QMs. In that case, the quiz could be shared by two first first time QMs who put in their best foot forward in making their half of the questions.

More than anything, this post is purely based on personal observation. I’d be glad if the current bunch of guys thought over this and made some changes if they felt right. Cheers.